Solutions

Review the project. Not just the submission.

A connected approach to documentation quality — from technical coordination to requirements and authority feedback. Availability depends on jurisdiction and review scope.

01 / DOCUMENT COORDINATION

Project QA

See the project between the disciplines.

Compare technical facts from architecture, structure, site planning and building services. Focus on mismatches that need coordination, rather than grammar or drawing style.

Technical facts with source references
Unit, scope and version-aware comparisons
Evidence-led priorities for specialist review

02 / REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST

Technical Conditions Check

Controlled pilot

Connect each requirement to project evidence.

Structure issued technical conditions into a checklist, then locate supporting project evidence. Conditional, unsupported or ambiguous clauses remain marked for review. This capability is being validated through a controlled pilot.

Requirement text preserved alongside findings
Evidence found, not found, contradictory or needs review
Multiple evidence sources where a requirement spans documents

03 / SUBMISSION FOLLOW-UP

Authority Feedback Review

Turn authority feedback into a reviewable response.

Review authority comments and decisions, identify required responses and locate supporting project evidence. This supports your team’s response; it is not an official permit review.

Authority comments and permit-related requirements
Links to relevant supporting documentation
Clear questions for the design team — no approval guarantee

04 / COMING SOON

Specification ↔ BOQ / Estimate

Close the gap between what is designed and what is priced.

Compare project specifications with bills of quantities and cost estimates to identify missing items, quantity differences and material mismatches. This feature is not available for use or included in a current purchase.

Project-only and estimate-only items
Quantity, unit and material mismatches
Potential duplicates for review

For the whole project team

A shared view of project quality.

Architects & Engineers

Cross-discipline checks, technical facts and documentation consistency.

Contractors

Detect documentation inconsistencies before work starts on site.

Developers / Owners

An independent pre-check before submission or procurement.

Private clients

Understand project risks and prepare better questions for your design team.

Start with the right context

Where is your project?

Check regional coverage before choosing a review.

Choose a region